Under President Joe Biden, the U.S. government’s green bank, the Energy Department’s Loan Programs Office (LPO), flourished, with its lending capacity expanded to $400 billion, focusing on financing clean energy technologies. However, if Donald Trump returns to the White House, insiders suggest that this massive funding pool could shift dramatically toward fossil fuel projects and other energy initiatives favored by Republicans.
Thomas Pyle, who previously led the Department of Energy’s (DOE) transition team under Trump, hinted that if Trump is re-elected, the LPO might fund projects that align with his energy priorities. “If there are projects he likes, they will likely focus on energy production or electricity generation,” Pyle noted. This could significantly alter the course of the U.S. energy transition, which has been centered on clean technology and reducing carbon emissions. A Trump administration could potentially focus more on natural gas, mining, and fossil energy.
While the LPO has historically funded key projects in the clean energy sector, including Tesla’s early production and several large-scale solar farms, a shift in focus would put critical clean tech sectors at risk. Commercial banks, which often shy away from the riskier clean energy projects that need large-scale funding, rely on the LPO to bridge the gap. If the LPO redirected funding to fossil fuel projects, it could hamper the development of battery production, green steel, and other sectors critical to achieving net-zero emissions.
Peter Davidson, former LPO executive director and current CEO of Aligned Climate Capital, emphasized the importance of LPO in the clean energy transition: “Removing a cornerstone of the energy transition disrupts the entire chain.”
The program has historically played a crucial role in financing clean energy innovations, with the office having earned $5 billion in interest payments and maintaining a loan-loss ratio comparable to that of commercial banks. Notably, it has issued high-profile loans, including $9.2 billion to Ford Motor Co. for constructing battery plants and $3 billion to solar company Sunnova Energy. In July 2023, the office had 209 open applications seeking $281 billion in financing, highlighting its key role in the clean energy sector.
However, despite its success under the Biden administration, Trump could change course. While his first term saw attempts to dismantle the LPO, his administration ultimately sought to issue new loans, primarily for nuclear and other energy projects. In Trump’s second term, the LPO might pivot toward projects like natural gas storage and advanced fossil energy technologies.
The program’s structure, established under President George W. Bush, prevents any president from unilaterally disbanding it. But if Trump returns, his administration could opt to withhold new loan approvals, effectively stalling the program. This is particularly concerning given Biden’s climate law, which boosted the program’s capacity to nearly $400 billion, but with strict deadlines for disbursing funds by 2026 and 2028.
As discussions heat up in boardrooms, clean energy executives and investors are preparing for the potential of a funding freeze if Trump resumes control. “Any CEO worth their salt is thinking hard about this right now,” said Matthew Nordan, co-founder of Azolla Ventures, a climate tech investment firm. Sasha Mackler, executive director at the Bipartisan Policy Center, warned that halting LPO’s lending would be “a major setback” for the energy transition, as no other institution has the resources and capacity of the LPO.
The LPO’s fate hangs in the balance as the 2024 presidential election approaches. With significant implications for both the clean energy sector and traditional fossil fuel industries, the future of this $400 billion funding engine could shift dramatically depending on who holds the White House.
Analysis: The potential redirection of LPO’s $400 billion fund under a Trump administration could present a significant opportunity for the fossil fuel industry, particularly in natural gas, mining, and advanced fossil energy technologies. By refocusing these funds, the fossil fuel sector could witness renewed investment in infrastructure, including storage hubs and carbon capture projects, which are integral to keeping fossil fuels competitive in a shifting global energy market.
However, such a shift could have profound consequences for the clean energy sector. With the Biden administration’s emphasis on clean technologies like solar, wind, and electric vehicles, the LPO has been a critical financing tool in de-risking investments that commercial banks are reluctant to fund. For investors in green technology, the loss of LPO-backed financing could slow innovation and delay progress toward net-zero emissions.
In terms of profitability, fossil fuel developers could see lower project costs as LPO financing typically comes with lower interest rates compared to private loans. This would make the economics of fossil energy projects more favorable. On the flip side, the lack of funding for clean tech could limit opportunities for investors and entrepreneurs looking to capitalize on emerging green markets.
While it remains uncertain how Trump would steer the LPO, the potential pivot underscores the critical role of policy in shaping market dynamics in both the fossil fuel and renewable energy sectors.
Leave feedback about this