Thailand’s leading opposition party is set to challenge the extensive authority of the Constitutional Court, following recent political upheavals that saw the dissolution of the country’s most popular party and the removal of the prime minister. The newly formed People’s Party, consisting of members from the now-disbanded Move Forward party, plans to introduce legislation aimed at making it more difficult for the court to dissolve political parties and to reduce penalties for politicians.
In an interview on August 15 in Bangkok, Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut, the 37-year-old leader of the People’s Party and a former tech entrepreneur, stated, “The court holds power that is disconnected from the people. Its actions undermine institutions that are elected by the people, despite the court itself not representing the electorate.” He emphasized that the party’s goal is to end the use of legal tactics—often referred to as “lawfare”—that independent agencies have employed to dismantle elected institutions.
Over the past 27 years, Thailand’s Constitutional Court has dissolved more than 100 political parties and unseated three prime ministers, raising concerns about the state of democracy in a country that has also experienced two military coups during the same period. Critics argue that the court serves to protect the interests of the pro-royalist establishment.
Recent court rulings, including the dissolution of the Move Forward party and the ousting of Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have sparked further debate about the separation of powers in Thailand. According to Napon Jatusripitak, a visiting fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, the court’s actions suggest it is dictating the boundaries of legislative action and asserting control over the ethical standards required to lead the executive branch.
The court justified its decision to dissolve Move Forward by stating that the party’s platform, which included proposals to amend the controversial lese majeste law (Article 112), threatened Thailand’s constitutional monarchy. This law protects the Thai royal family from criticism, and the court’s ruling led to a 10-year political ban for the party’s top leaders.
The People’s Party, which emerged just days after Move Forward’s dissolution, draws its name from the group behind the 1932 Siamese Revolution that ended absolute monarchy in Thailand. The party has made it clear that its priority will be to reform the Constitutional Court before pursuing changes to Article 112. Natthaphong expressed hopes of gaining bipartisan support within months and passing the necessary legislation before the next national election, anticipated in 2027.
However, achieving these reforms may prove challenging. “The power to dissolve political parties has been one of the most reliable tools for checking the power of elected officials,” Napon observed. “It is difficult to imagine conservative stakeholders giving up this power without resistance.”
Despite its popularity, the People’s Party faces significant legal challenges. An investigation by the National Anti-Corruption Commission into a draft amendment to Article 112 proposed by Move Forward could result in a lifetime political ban for about 25 members of the People’s Party, including Natthaphong. The court’s dissolution of Move Forward has already led to a decade-long ban for eight former lawmakers, including Pita Limjaroenrat, a former prime ministerial candidate.
Move Forward itself was a successor to another reformist party, Future Forward, which was dissolved just a year after its debut in the 2019 election.
“If we end up being banned, we will pass the torch to others who will continue our mission,” Natthaphong asserted.
The People’s Party remains committed to reforming Article 112, despite the court’s ruling that prohibits Move Forward lawmakers from campaigning or seeking to amend the law outside of the legislative process—a ruling that leaves the path forward unclear.
“We don’t have a clear timeline for amending Article 112 yet, but we will certainly push ahead with it,” Natthaphong confirmed. “For now, our focus is on rebuilding after the dissolution and advancing amendments to the constitution and the laws governing political parties.”
Analysis and Market Impact
For investors and market participants, the ongoing political developments in Thailand present both risks and opportunities. The People’s Party’s efforts to reform the Constitutional Court could lead to significant changes in the country’s political landscape, potentially affecting the stability of Thailand’s governance structures. However, the likelihood of achieving these reforms remains uncertain, given the entrenched interests of conservative stakeholders.
Investors should closely monitor the situation, particularly any legislative developments that could impact Thailand’s legal and political framework. The outcome of these reforms could influence the country’s business environment, investor confidence, and overall economic stability.
Leave feedback about this